Would anybody be interested in starting a Psychoanalysis reading

>>9601161
I will once Jungians are banned and there will be no Jung readings. I won't associate with filthy heretics

>>9601161
I would be in. Can we read the Case Studies at some point? Anyway, a Bump.

>>9601170
CLEAN

>>9601170
lol

I would as long as you start with something that isn't Interpretation; I've read that already.

>>9601170
If the group lasts, I propose we move to Adler after Freud anyway. That may change.
>>9601178
Sounds good to me. I don't want to end up reading only Dreams and Civ and Discontents and then go "well, we're done here!" I would want this to be something more dedicated than that. So I think we should check those out.

File: IMG_1468.jpg (75KB, 620x591px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 620x591px

>>9601195
Civ and discontents was to me a weak and kind of tangential work. How do people start online reading groups anyway?

>>9601204
>How do people start online reading groups anyway?

They pick up some stupid app like discord and awkwardly try to force productive chemistry between a bunch of strangers in an unfamiliar medium

>>9601209
>being this much of a virgin

>>9601209
Ugh sounds like shit. Maybe a dedicated /Freud/ general?

>>9601204
I had Discord in mind. I'll wait for a few more responses to make a chat, but it seems like a few people are already interested.

>>9601220
This is OP. >>9601219 actually sounds better than Discord.

>>9601230
The only thing is, how would a reading group gen thread work? Would we have like a suggested reading? I'm thinking of picking up the Freud Reader (either the Gay one or the Penguin one)

>>9601248
Just put your faith in meme magic
Like these dubs

File: IMG_0560.jpg (27KB, 253x450px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 253x450px

>>9601269
Take this one