"A man cannot search either for what he knows or for what he does not know. He cannot search for what he knows--since he knows it, there is no need to search--nor for what he does not know, for he does not know what to look for."
DUDE ANAMNESIS LMAO
>>9598024
Sophistry
>>9598024
>hmm, what's the capital of Egypt? I'm not quite sure
>look it up
>oh, it's Cairo
I didn't know that, and now I know.
B
T
F
O
>>9598276
Not op. I only point out that op gives us a sourceless quotation with an image that suggests an ironic stance. Is the stance purveyed here ironic as well? My guess is yes, which renders //your response adequate. But it's not so clearly ironic as op's.
What to do? Hunt the source and comment with respect to the quarry. Classic /lit/ senpai-
>>9598024
We are directed to what we don't know by scarcity of what we known around the unknown.
Also continuos fields were and are created where following them you have trust to know the yet unknown.
It's semantic play that begs the question how we receive new information.
>>9598276
Aha! However, your example utilises a subject line of a question with an answer inside of it *sniff* a "known-unknown" if you will.