Poorfag here. This is likely a dumb question but I've always

>>9559333
Yes, you take them off when reading and put them on when done. They start looking like shit very quickly anyways and have virtually no function, so many just store them separately in a box somewhere or throw them away.

>>9559333
Whatever you think looks better on the shelf. Some jackets are very attractive, but the plain binding is traditional.

theres no right or wrong answer to this

I just throw them in the trash unless particularly good looking like the ones on art books. They're solely there to save the publisher money on binding and marketing.

>>9559357
>>9559342

>throwing the dust jacket in the trash
i would be triggered, but i remember most posters here shop at goodwill, and arent buying spicy first editions or anything valuable

>>9559361
>trying to be elitist about his mass market shit printed on toilet paper
I have a couple of first editions of Chateaubriand, Rimbaud and Kafka. Proper bindings don't need a wrapper. Now back to /co/, faggot.

you're supposed to wear them, you retard

>>9559458

pics or gtfo

File: serveimage.jpg (508KB, 800x649px) Image search: [Google]

508KB, 800x649px

>>9559458
>first editions of Chateaubriand
lol

File: ww-penise.jpg (79KB, 1200x900px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 1200x900px

>>9559484