>(Insert literary classic) is only considered a masterpiece

>>9556048
such as?

It's true though

>>9556051
The Canterbury tales, Moby Dick, The Brothers Karamazov, etc.

>>9556058
all of those men were part black.

>>9556074
WE

>>9556048

>Rage, Goddess, sing the Rage of Mortimer's son the Harold,
>Stertorous, Bloomed, that cost the Resentments countless losses -
>Hurling down to the house of schlock so many shaky tomes
>Great liberal tomes, their bindings made carrion, feast for the queers and dolts.
>Begin, Muse, when the two first broke and clashed,
>Brilliant Our Harold and derivative Stephen the King -
>And the will of the Bard was moving towards its end

File: alolan costanza.png (288KB, 394x370px) Image search: [Google]

288KB, 394x370px

>>9556048

>(insert literary classic written by a woman or someone who wasn't/isn't white) is only considered a masterpiece because of the SJWs

>>9556048
You're going to have to pad out this PhD thesis a little bit more but I think it shows promise.

>(my book) isn't considered a classic by now because I am a victim

>>9556048
>another thinly veiled /pol/ thread
this board is shit now.