Is there a good list of classics that should be read in order?

>>9486798
>Is there a good list of classics that should be read in order?
Yes.

>>9486798

Just work through Blooms list in a haphazard sort of way. Go chronological, use wiki, find what sounds interesting to you and read it. Move on from an era when you feel like it.

>>9486813
Thanks

>>9486819
Thanks even more

>>9486798
you could check out columbia's literature humanities reading list. It's essentially a much abbreviated western canon

There are shorter lists on the same website where you find Bloom's list.

Start with the Bible and finish with the Bible.

>>9486798
I hated all the Start with the Greeks guides, so I made my own reading list for the Greeks and Romans. But it's long. If you want, I can send it to you, and if you really care, I could bold the stuff which is essential. I was gonna make a chart out of it but never got around to it.

>>9487492
Not him but I'll slurp it up

>>9487542
Alright, I'll post it tomorrow. If this thread is dead by then I'll start a new one.

>>9486798

You can check out the Thomas Aquinas College syllabus: https://thomasaquinas.edu/a-liberating-education/syllabus

>>9487492
You were unhappy with the existing charts because they were too short, or for other reasons? Have you gone through your entire list yet?

>>9486798
T H E - G R E E K S

>>9486798
Start by whatever interest you and go from there.