Anything you can recommend on the subject of "Is logos inherently

>>9478673
its not you tardo

>>9478675
What say you in your defense?

>>9478694
Pathos is able to persuade anyone's heart if the person even considers it an inkling of pathos, while logos seems dull and monotonous most of the time and loses people's attention.
source? Life

>>9478673
ethos is by far the most important. considering that aristotle intended these to elements of oration. ideally a good speech would use all three but ethos (essentially your credibility as a person) determines whether or not your audience trusts you. a scientist could have all of the logos in the world, but if they can't establish good ethos, their facts are useless. pathos is shit for actually convincing people, but amazing for reaffirming the opinions of the people who agree with your point.
t. college debater

sans Logos, none of this can even be discussed.