Why is /lit/ so fucking stale
Always the same books being talked about
Nobody ever discovers anything new
How many times can people see another recent purchases thread where someone posts pics of the meme trilogy coupled with blood meridian and a delillo book
>>9470917
be the change you want to see.
Because mods keep deleting my Land threads.
Plinko faggots.
Be the brappost you want Stacy to be impressed by.
>>9470923
>Plinko faggots.
Read Semantogtaphy, it's the final boss
>>9470917
Try him.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roberto_Calasso
https://www.theparisreview.org/interviews/6168/roberto-calasso-the-art-of-fiction-no-217-roberto-calasso
>>9470932
I thought Zettel's Traum was the ultimate boss
>>9470938
Seconded.
There is literally a thread up right now about medieval romances, which you COULD go post in, but of course you've never read a chivalric romance because you're TOO MUCH OF A PLEB.
>>9470917
I recently bought Davies' The Deptford Trilogy, and Falling Angles by Barbara Gowdy.
>>9470953
pleb
>>9470917
Skim through the usual and you'll find something of worth every now and then. It's not like you need to find twenty new writers every day.
>>9471004
This. You have to weed through the shitposting and sameposting to find those quality discussion threads.
The board hasn't changed much over the years. There's a lot of shit, but there's still some great threads where I can find a new author to binge-read.
For what it's worth, I'm currently reading Library of America's Raymond Carver short story collection. Great stuff. Dark, world-weary Americana. Carver was a brilliant short story writer. Hell of a drunk, too.
/lit/ isn't for discussing books it's for posing as a "literary" person who only reads the most sophisticated books. If you want people who talk about books go to /sffg/, but all they read is trashy genre fiction that even they despise.