reminder that this:
>all things are flux
>language cannot represent things as they are
>the structures of language are the structures of thought
>we can never conceive things as they are
>this limit can be approached through negation
>conceptions must battle and subjugate negations to bring the next conception, closer to the thing as it is, into being
>all things outside the ego are negations
>we must continuously destroy that which is outside ourselves to be re-born as our true selves
is just step one. however you approach the world afterwards, you must also confront your own psyche and memories
So deep and really says something about something
>>9463241
>>we can never conceive things as they are
more like there's an infinite number of ways to see a thing
>>9463252
those are not mutually exclusive
Language isn't meant to represent things, dumbfuck.
>>9463291
no one said it was, just that it doesn't
>thinks he's being smart by posting things Heraclitus already knew 2500 years ago
>>9463299
lol
>>9463241
Broski, throw off your dogmatic transcendentalist/idealist shackles. Didn't anyone ever tell you that the phenomenon is the reality?