Do you give the authors funny voices when you read philosophy? Or do you always give them deep, serious manly voices?
I picture the guy who does all the movie trailer voices
imagine reading marx with the voice of the narrator of powerpuff girls
I give them my own voice, but in a more manly and stoic tone.
>>9456878
this
I just use the voices inside my head desu
>subvocalising
>>9457028
Literally nothing wrong with subvocalization, bro. Speed reading is a meme.
It depends. Elmer Fudd, Space Ghost, Groucho Marx, and Bart Simpson, come to mind. Alternatively, The 3 Stooges.
This is why I hate reading some books, it's parsing someones literal mindstream imprint on text. God you must be like the best filter man there's a lot of genuinely bad stuff out here
Sylvester Stallone on a heavy dose of Xanax. At least, that's about how well I understand most serious philosophy.
I subvocalize but I don't know what the voice is in my mind. There must be one, because I 'hear' the words when I read but I couldn't describe it.
Jamba Juice is always a drunk screaming irishman
Wewgenstein is silent
>>9456849
I can't help it. I do it spontaneously sometimes. I'll give them pretentious French accents or stereotypical German accenta evem though I speak neither language.
>>9458863
*accents
*even
Damn sausage fingers.
>tfw you've watched so many of his lectures you can reproduce his intonation, pauses, emphasis, etc. flawlessly.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=TK0R_06zOOY
>>9458919
I can't stand listening to Chomsky. His (un)dead voice makes him even harder to follow than Badiou (who's lectures you can speed up to make him normal(ish) sounding). Maybe it's an acquired taste, but I don't recall ever having trouble listening to Zizek despite all his vocal and bodily mannerisms for example.
>>9457028
>Not fully vocalizing and acting out the writing and using props and hand gestures to assist with the immersion
I can't believe I share a board with these plebs.