Does lit have a starter chart for nonfiction? I've been

Are you being serious?

What sort of nonfiction are we talking about here?

Philosophy has a linear progression because, relatively speaking, very few people are philosophers compared to writers of fiction or nonfiction.

What sort of nonfiction? Self-help? Political commentary on Neo-Liberal practices? Why Baseball is on the decline? What is the impact of technology on Generation Z?

I suggest you gather a few topics you want to read about and then go from there.

>>9445375
Isn't there a lit wiki full of chars. I don't know if its still around or any good though

>>9445375
The god delusion
Das kapital
The Selfish gene
Consciousness explained by daniel dennett
Singularity is near

>>9445426
>Singularity is near
by ray kurzweil.

>>9445426
Kek

>>9445375
>>9445449
Need more?

Sapiens: a brief history of humankind by yuval noah harari

Capital in the Twenty-First Century by Thomas Piketty

Imagined communities by benedict anderson

The invention of tradition by Eric Hobsbawn

Theories of International Politics and Zombies by Daniel Drezner

Dipomacy by Henry Kissinger

World order by Henry Kissinger

The Globalization of World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations by Steve Smith

>>9445403
Yes. I thought there might be a chart for essential nonfiction works, things like Plato's Dialogues, Il Principe but entry level. I'm a pleb and I don't really have particular interests.

>>9445699
>I don't really have particular interests.
then why do you want to read about anything
faggot

>>9445708
Why not?

>>9445721
because
>I'm a pleb and I don't really have particular interests.

>>9445723
Pleb.

You need to specify. I know some biology, psychology and political science books.

Fiction books are about imaginary events. Non-fictional ones are about literally everything else. Philosophy, art theory, politics, self-help and every type of science imaginable (history, math, physics, linguistics, logic etc) can be the theme. Vergil even wrote an epic poem about agriculture. What the fuck do you actually want?

>>9445375
Not really how it works.

If you use wikipedia recommended reading/sources for a certain subject, and then crosscheck with citations on jstor and oxfordbibliographies, you can find the best, or at least most cited works on any given subject.

>>9445772
Thanks for the suggestion.
>you can find the best, or at least most cited works on any given subject
I thought maybe lit created a chart with something like this, similar to the entry level or top 100.

>>9445842
no, they didn't. unless you're talking about just philosophy. check the wiki