judge the last book you read without resorting to good-bad, beautiful-ugly, conscious-sublimated, realistic-ideologic, reactionary-progressive, stimulating-anaesthetic, authentic-inauthentic dichotomies.
it was good
It was funny
>>9431696
>it was stimulating
Utopia by Thomas More was a good book with some bad parts. I thought the dichotomy between a good and bad society created a stimulating and authentic commentary on the beautiful and ugly parts of human nature. Although not realistic, certain progressive ideas are seen that call forth and question the relationship between humans and perfection.
>>9431725
>>9431674
It was beautiful
>>9431674
It made clever use of repetition and convention to achieve a paradoxically minimalist aesthetic.
>>9431751
sounds like a refreshingly progressive use of conventions
It was a book. The text was arranged on each page to present an idea. The text was legible.
>>9431674
it was humerous but underwhelming
>Slaughterhouse 5
>>9431778
is that a Keira?
>>9431674
is that morgante?
>>9431810
yes
>>9431806
yes
>>9431891
morgante is neat.
>>9431674
Just read the Great Divorce by C. S. Lewis. It was informed and knowledgeable.
>>9433426
Christ cuck detected
Just finished the Iliad. It was fucking sick, bro.