What is some good literature about Fascism?
I've recently realized that I know very little about fascism itself, fascist thinking, and what individual fascists envision(ed) in society.
I'd like anything. I'd prefer neutral analysis of it but I'm fine with literature biased towards it, against it, or critique of it from the other sides.I swear I'm not /pol/I'd just like to understand more about Fascist thinking because it's such an odd ideology. I've read a lot of Communist and anarchist literature and while I don't necessarily agree with them, I started to see their reasoning slightly.
I read "The anatomy of fascism". People told me I should go to the source however.
I suppose you could start with the book above and after that go to the sources of fascist thought.
>>9422590
>>9422596
why don't you take it to the source? here's a /pol/ thread on the same subject. If anything, you'll at least get some serious recommendations
>>>/pol/122604926
>>9422604
A lot of that thread is other brands of fascism tho and including new thought
OP could instead read Italian futurism and what not
Most contemporary scholars of fascism are intellectual midgets, (see Tamir Bar-On) who just get off on being academic antifa. But I like Roger Griffen's work
>>9422604
>/pol/
>fascists
Do people actually believe this?
>>9422590
Hannah Arendt's "The Origins of Totalitarianism" is considered a key text, but it's definately from the perspective of "after fascism" and that it's defeat was a good thing. Still, an enlightening book, it doesn't hide it's position, nor is it just a polemic of "fascism = bad".
1984, The Art of the Deal, and pic related
>>9422754
>Channelling Reddit this hard
Careful Anon.
OP here you go. Get ready to be redpilled you degenerate cuck (hehe). Praise Kek!
>>9422860
lollllllllllllll
this bait is so stupid its funny
>>9422590
From a great thread on /his/.
>>9422590
Dugin's Fourth Political Theory has a novel analysis of 20th century fascism. It's not the main subject of the book though.