Hello /lit/, newfag here. What books should I read in order to

Fug off, pseud.

>>9419655
fuck off, frogshitter

Wittgenstein is all you need

File: Understanding Kant without secondary.png (586KB, 946x2017px) Image search: [Google]

586KB, 946x2017px

>>9419655
If you're in a hurry just go straight to David Hume and Immanuel Kant, the rest is an adjunct.

>4 posts
>no greeks
?

>>9419689
I was going to, but then I figured it would be massive waste of time.

>>9419655
Hi newfag fast becoming cancer, learn to read a board's sticky and lurk first.

>>9419655
All the best intellectuals kill themselves so start there

>>9419676
>Reading Kant with only Hume under your belt
Bad idea. Im a quarter way into cpr and am restarting the entire modern program after only reading Hume and Descartes. You need a strong rationalist foundation for Kant

Document put together by some anons:

https://docs.google.com/document/u/1/d/1y8_RRaZW5X3xwztjZ4p0XeRplqebYwpmuNNpaN_TkgM/pub

>>9419729
Not OP, but thanks. I had been waiting to see this reposted for some time now since I forgot to save it when I first saw it.