https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BATPzXjmV_s
>I don't read novels. I prefer good literary criticism. That way you get both the novelists' ideas as well as the critics' thinking.
What are /lit/'s thoughts?
I think I am going to watch this movie tomorrow, I'm intrigued.
>>9412288
So he's basically just having someone give him an opinion without forming one himself. Sounds pretty stupid to me.
what is the movie title sir the actress looks familiar
looks like the worst movie ive ever seen t b h
>>9412769
metropolitan dir. by Whit Stillman
>>9412778
that's right thanks
>I don't eat food in restaurants, I eat shit that finest restaurant critics have produced
Idiotic. The film's making fun of her.
How are you guys so bad at spotting satire? It's /pol/-levels of perception, in here.
>>9413501
Almodovar and Rudolph are fathers along with WS. Woody's grandfather to them all.
>>9412294
Save it for the holiday season. Watch Barcelona now instead.
>>9412288
And in the end you don't have the trouble to think for yourself.
>>9414435
No
The last days of disco is the most literary
>>9414959
Oh, pardon me- I was simply recommending the better movie.
>>9413513
/lit/ has always been one of the thickest boards on 4chan. I truly don't understand why.
>>9415312
Probably because of the jews
>>9414430
Lubitsch, Truffaut
>>9413501
I think Barcelona, Last Days of Disco, and Love & Friendship are good as well. Damels in Distress was disappointing though.
>>9415474
I couldnt finish any of his other movies and to be honest, I find Metropolitan difficult to rewatch but I did like it when I first saw it.
>>9415712
To be fair, I have a particular weakness for smarmy Chris Eigeman characters, as they essentially represent my own (inaccurate) self-image.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DH9nqX9sYUs (the Shakespeare discussion cracks me up, and that jacket is outstanding)
And, of course https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oEUGmWlkJZk which is what I like to imagine a /lit/ gathering would actually devolve into.
>>9416335
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tToVrKnEmuw
>>9412764
who /momlet/ here