People get really grump when I say the cover isn't that important. I know it's counter intuitive, so I made a video about it.
https://youtu.be/p1zEbAtg9B0
>>9411597
I'm not a literal retard so I didn't need this advice but your video is nice
>>9411604
That means a lot.
>>9411597
This video is pretty comfy. Good job, my guy.
>>9411625
/lit/4lyfe
I'm a writer.
I love you guys.
>>9411597
Nice video. I'm not a writer, but as a consumer I totally agree, as long as the book won't fall apart the presentation doesn't matter to me.
For digitally distributed books the cover is almost superfluous.
>>9412625
>For digitally distributed books the cover is almost superfluous
Wut? I'm not going to watch some anon's YouTube video, but how the hell are you going to sell your ebook among the thousands of others without paying attention to the cover? Granted it doesn't have to be amazing, but surely it does have to be (a) distinctive, (b) memorable, and (c) not shit.
>>9411597
>shows milk and honey
>the content is good
stopped watching right there
>>9412656
I lied. I ever read it.
>>9412652
Okay. Well, it answers that.
>>9411597
Attractive voice right here
>>9411597
An incredible insight into the minds of the pseudo-artists whose only concern is to get rich and famous ASAP. Especially love the book choices.
>>9414050
Is this sarcasm? I never know.
>>9411597
You are pathetic as fuck. Just reproducing and miming other youtubers because you have no talent at all. Read: no talent at anything. Kill yourself americuck burger subhuman trash
>>9415241
>>9415233
it is
now you know
Well for ebooks sure but for a paper version I do sometimes fall for the pretty cover (unless the translation is worse).