Are there any writers/philosophers who argue that the written word is actually not great for thought, and that most critical information should be absorbed through speech?
Are there authors/ philosophers who argue for or against the existence of half-button presses?
>>9411362
Plato
>>9411362
Socrates
Socrates was all about that life.
>>9411362
Anyone else feel like most games would benefit from outrageously simplifying their mechanics, e.g. recovering health when you swim at the surface because it does double duty as the breath gauge?
Please answer in the form of literature.
>>9411391
I guess I feel like, if you have to orally express things to others, they have to be more solid arguments with more real-world basis. And the inflection of tone you use adds some important to the concepts. When I listen to lectures, I feel like I absorb them more than just reading a book. I wonder if there is anything to be said from learning through listening, as opposed to reading.
>>9411362
Derrida
>>9411368
Kek
>>9411420
wrong
>>9411420
Derrida is a butt head
>>9411362
Nietzsche.
>All truly great thoughts are conceived by walking.
>Of all that is written, I love only what a person hath written with his blood. Write with blood, and thou wilt find that blood is spirit. It is no easy task to understand unfamiliar blood; I hate the reading idlers. He who knoweth the reader, doeth nothing more for the reader. Another century of readers--and spirit itself will stink.
And he says much more on this throughout his works.