What do you think about stream of consciousness surrealist literature?

i take a sip of tropical green, as I peruse through a boring post.

It's the literature equivalent of mumblecore. Nothing inherently wrong with that writing style, just difficult at times for readers to break into.

I despise it.

If there is no real narrative reason for it,it becomes tedious

If its a general,avant-garde writting project it has to be really well written

It's probably the most difficult style to pull off, maybe 5 authors in history did it well...and yet this is what every single douchey little coffee house writing faggot wants to emulate.

Stream of consciousness is best used for realist works.

>>9409362
List those 5 authors.

>>9409302
>Stream of consciousness literature
Just don't. It's one of those things that's only worth doing if you're a genuinely great writer.
Nobody wants to read a book from a guy writing in a starbucks that thinks he's joyce 2.0

True patricians don't need plot.

>>9409614

You know...all of the famous stream of consciousness also did have pretty complex plots as well.

I never get when queers like this say that stream of consciousness is plotless. I think it's basically just their excuse as to why their work is just directionless rambling.