On its own, without any comparison to any of Pynchon's other work, is it a good book?
if you're nostalgic for dotcom bubble era nyc might as well read it, but it's not that good
Nah just read Neuromancer instead.
>>9404169
come on now, neuromancer is a piece of shit, bleeding edge may suck but it's still pynchon
No.
>>9404169
you might as well recommend Ready Player One
(I don't recommend Ready Player One)
It's good. Just a bit longer than it justifies.
>>9404185
Can anyone post that one page that's just references for Ready Player One?
>>9404195
page from bleeding edge?
>>9404169
bleeding edge makes me want to read neuromancer
gonna have to buy myself a copy one of these days
>>9404185
Neuromancer is leagues better than RPO. Check your privilege.
>>9404180
... Whatever happened to work standing independent of its author. If a book sucks its author ought to be irrelevant
>>9404152
It's a solid 3/5.
I think Bleeding Edge actually suffers from being a Pynchon novel. People are willing to shit on it because it doesn't have the reputation of his other books yet.
I really liked Bleeding Edge. It's a good book about family, NYC, computers, conspiracies, and the early 2000s. The father-daughter conversation towards the end of the book is a great resolution to all of the themes in the book.