[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

Daily reminder that nothing exists except physical reality.

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

Thread replies: 11
Thread images: 3

File: 1477813046729.jpg (279KB, 1200x1200px) Image search: [Google]
1477813046729.jpg
279KB, 1200x1200px
Daily reminder that nothing exists except physical reality. Ontology is a sham.
>>
File: IMG_4066.jpg (193KB, 1000x706px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_4066.jpg
193KB, 1000x706px
>>9393854
Daily reminder that everything is real.
>>
>>9393854
you seem to be making an ontological commitment of some sort
>>
Daily reminder OP is a faggot
>>
>>9393854
>what is empty space
>>
File: 6jdfff.jpg (418KB, 980x929px) Image search: [Google]
6jdfff.jpg
418KB, 980x929px
Nice circular argument
>nothing exists except physical reality
>implies that the measure of existence is the measure of physicality
>thus making only physical objects qualify for existence
>>
>>9394100
based
>>
>>9394100
>implies that the measure of existence is the measure of physicality
No, it doesn't.
>>
>>9394100
Yes that is a nice circular argument that you conjured up, indeed. Too bad it's fallacious and has nothing to do with what OP asserted.
>>
>>9393854
You misunderstand ontology. You make a positive existential claim in your invocation of physical reality and even worse you go no further and refuse to explore what entities exist in physical reality and what their nature is. You're the sham.
>>
>>9394100
there's no argument in the OP you crouton
it's an assertion
your "critique" looks like this:
>thesis that X is Y
>implies that the criterion of X is Y
>thus making only X qualify as Y
where on earth did you divine the latter two propositions?
use that noggin more
Thread posts: 11
Thread images: 3


[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.