Harold Bloom loved this book so much that he took it upon himself

>>9376788
I read this and Phantastes (GM) on a friend's rec. Both have a comfy Victorian parlor room feel, but very different. And yes, both are good. I later learned Bloom likes both, and was probably my friend's source.

>>9376788
I've read it, and it's shit. Gnostic allegorical shit.

>>9376788
It's pretty good. Kind of a ballsy decision to spend so much time on visual description that it's literally impossible to imagine (invented colors, geometrical impossibilities, etc.)

>>9376788
I enjoyed it so much that I plan on eventually buying Bloom's memequel once I feel like I understand literature enough to know what he was getting at. Hopefully there are still copies kicking around in 2050.

>>9376788
Probably just an adolescent favourite that he extended his autism towards.

>>9376788
>It's pretty good
Bloom's sequel?