Why are the women in Pynchon's works always breaking

>>9360456
what a based cover

>>9360456
Women are simply inferior to the white man and their rightful place is subordinate to an authoritarian, disciplinary white male who decided how she should live - preferably a life devoted to domestic life.

A woman cannot create art; a woman cannot truly be ethical; a woman cannot truly love; a woman cannot truly be loyal.
These are all facts, but will be labelled 'sexist' by liberal brainwashing society because it doesn't fit the narrative of equality.

Women simply aren't as ontologically 'there' as men, they're shallow and lack depth, they're not as self-conscious as man. They aren't properly inscribed into the symbolic text which is why they can only think about Chad cock instead of true good matters and subjects.

Women are an embarrassment. They should stay at home where they belong; they don't deserve power or rights, because they are driven by emotion and will never be anything but inherently evil and destructive qua their inferior natures.
Without their festering mackerel-reeking cunts, they would have been killed off by man a long time ago. Pynchon knows this and shows it. He's redpilled

>>9360473

I actually found a copy on ebay not too long ago.

It's put together very well.

>>9360477

>>>/polr9k/

Please leave.

Which works have you read OP? I seem to remember a lot of men breaking women's hearts too in GR and V.