Can we agree that Foucault's entire body of work is there to justify his perversions?
Do you agree?
philosophy is a perversion
>>9341571
Sexy post
>>9341514
Though personally neither here nor there so far as his aims are concerned, Foucault was an inexhaustible scholar, and to dream otherwise is just silly. Oh, wait a minute. Silliness is the intention here. My bad. However, I'd say his range was too broad to include only his obsessions, chief of which was scholarship.
>>9341514
>retards still think that foucalt wrote about the semiotics of fisting
>>9341514
>implying this is not the point of all Literature
>>9341514
It's time
To The History of Sexuality Vol. 1