There are clear objective morals we can call "universal".

>>9332885
no, only a retard will say the contrary

>>9332885
which morals would you consider universal

>>9332885
yes, only a moron would say otherwise.

define "objective"
define "morals"
define "universal"
define "yay or nay"

File: IMG-20170403-WA0014.jpg (3KB, 84x125px) Image search: [Google]

3KB, 84x125px

>>9332885
I feel a spook a brewing

:O

"moralities are a sign language of the affects"

Can those stupid cunts that keep making those philosophy 101 stupid threads just fuck off?

>>9332950
What's your answer then mr. smartie pants

>>9332953
No.

Who but a person of faith or a fucking moron would say no?

>>9332970
* say yes

Yes, but we as mere mortals do not and can not know them.

>>9332979
>muh noumena

>>9332979
wat

>>9332885
ARGUE WITH YOUR SUFFERING AND SEE HOW FAR THAT GETS YOU

SLAY THE DRAGON, VENERATE YOUR FATHER

GO OUT INTO THE WILDERNESS AND BRING BACK KNOWLEDGE

>>9332885
Yes

Unit 731

>>9333079
i got rocks

>>9332903
you forgot "define define"

>>9332885
Yes there are, the first moral is dont sleep with your sister, the second is dont attack people with weapons, i forget the rest.

Might makes right unironically
please persuade me otherwise before I develop a superman complex

>>9333623
>Might makes right unironically
I see you haven't read The Republic

>>9333623
the Germans were conquered by Jews and bitch about it endlessly despite being champions of this world view. This in and of itself should make it a distasteful unaesthetic view to hold and thus unworthy of belief.

>>9333641
I really despise this gross simplification of fascist "world view"

>>9333648
right, what we mean by might could be something like mental fortitude and not just some bulky cunt or a guy with a shotgun so