someone here is crazy enough to feel a real sadness because you realize (or you think you realize) all philosophy is just a mainstream branch of the human thoughts and his possibilities?.
Daily reminder to never take 'all ___ is/are just ___' thoughts seriously.
>>9329241
but why?. simple premises can be powerful.
ill take this like a no.
Some Philosophy's Literature (Hegel) most isn't (Kant, with the exception of the Judgement Critique and his letters) narrowly speaking, granted. Poetry, however, is not only more literary, but BETTER than philosophy both 'philosophically' and 'aesthetically'. If a single Wallace Stevens poem, say The Motive for Metaphor, were discussed with the same ardor as Phenomenologie des Geistes is in English translation every other day, Life would perhaps be more, m-more.. interesting. But I doubt it. Hume was a better historian.
>>9329196
only rationalists are sad to see that the human imagination is rather sterile towards any goal beyond projecting fantasies on what is experiences through the 5 other senses. Be an empiricist and none of this matters.
well it's just observation of works of man and nature in written form for me,,,
>>9329331
in your view, an empiricist can be sad at all?.