Analyze this line in 1984, /lit/: "We shall meet in the

>>9326765
they gon party on the sun

>>9326765
Why are socialists and liberals obsessed with this book as of the 2016 election? Do they not realize that they're on the wrong side if they want to apply the plot of this book to real life?

>>9326880
They fail to realize that Trump is Emmanuel Goldstein, not BB.

>>9326880
No, they are not self aware enough. It is part of their personalities

>>9326880

I'm not a socialist or liberal, I just like the book and I wanted to see what you anons had to say about this part of it.

>>9326871
Helios spring break 2018 boys! Bring your khakis and tacky frat boy sunglasses

>>9326765
Lamp aisle at Tesco

>>9326887
This is how I saw it.
>>9326889
Yeah, I figured as much. Sad.

>>9326894
Sorry buddy, didn't mean to derail your thread. Just popped into my mind.

>>9326920

>Sorry buddy, didn't mean to derail your thread. Just popped into my mind.

That's okay, anon. Thanks for posting in it. :~)

>>9326880

Jesus, kid. Were you not even alive during 2012 or 2008?

These books get brought up every fucking election cycle.

>>9327762
And the people that bring it up probably still haven't read it

It was obviously a reference to the ministry of truth you fucking tard

has no one read this book

>>9326920
>>9326887
you guys realise goldstein wasn't real i hope

>>9326880
They are on the wrong side, but so are the Trumpists and alt-wrongs.

They mean at a workplace

>>9326765
iirc the lights were always on at their workplace. shit book.

>>9326765
It's implied to mean O'Brien's 'excursion' into Winston's head removes any shadows of privacy, exposing Winston and his individuality to the seering light of the Inner Party

>>9326765
they will meet in their imaginations as no real place has no darkness (they will not meet at all, physically, but imagine themselves meeting each other)

>>9326765
I always thought he was alluding to their future meeting near the end of the book where he was prying and trying to show him ''the light'' of bb. any other answer is very plebeian and stupid thanks

>>9326765
I thought the book was saying that people are cowardly and lazy to take action when the things that would take their freedom are not quick in doing so. By the time people realize that their freedom has been taken away, it's already too late. People won't rebel against something that is only beginning to become controlling of them.

>>9328069
Trump isn't real