Is anyone interested in a /lit/ Discord channel that I made (since there doesn't seem to be one for this board)?
No, because multiple discord channels exist for /lit/ that you're too stupid to have noticed.
>>9319980
Where are the links for them?
>>9319995
https://discord.gg/8Ab23jk
>>9319980
This was the only one I could find: https://discord.gg/yjKEQ
>>9320051
How do you find discord channels?
>>9320032
shit discord
>>9320071
you're absolutely right, but there has never been a good /lit/ discord
>>9320095
All the invites in the archives are dead
>>9320101
as are all their associated channels
https://discord.gg/8Ab23jk is the only one still alive
>>9320103
for better or for worse it's the best, and only active, /lit/ discord
there have been a handful of attempts to make new /lit/cords but they're either 1. dead 2. in-group circlejerking 3. porn 4. all of the above
>>9320095
>by all means, make another one. it will be populated by the same cretins that frequent here
i have but its a small discord and we dont shill it on lit, though we met here
> /lit/ 2.0: Dude, you like books? just 'hang out' on the internet with these dweebs while they chat about anime
>>9319980
They also all suck, as OP's is sure to
>>9320129
but the current discord is just in group circlejerking and hardly any lit discussion
stop using discord and read more
>>9320131
congratulations i guess. I don;t see what your point is
>>9320137
try talking about books instead of posting about chat rooms on /lit/ then
>>9320131
Not much of a "lit discords" if it is just a gay club for you and your boyfriends.
Besides discord is privacy breaching garbage. Irc is better
>>9320145
the /lit/ IRC is shit and dead and the only people on it who read moved to discord
dont shill your garbage chat on /lit/
>>9320153
looks like you cant read.
not a good start for the claim that "people who read moved to discord"
>>9320032
>literally a 6 of the same people for hundreds of messages
>they're sharing tinder screenshots
fuck this board
>>9320199
>implying people read on /lit/
>>9320199
>literally a 6 of the same people for hundreds of messages
how many people do you think are on /lit/ lmao
its like 30 active people in any given month
>>9320217
maybe in 2013
https://catalog.neet.tv/stats.html
>>9320217
>30 active people
Are (You) new or just mentally handicapped?
>>9320247
We are all /lit/ on this blessed day
>>9320290
I'd like to see when and where you got those statistics
>>9320217
> you don't like that our discord is even less on topic than /lit/?
> WE ARE /lit/!
cringe worthy defense of your shitty chat room
>>9320415
I have never used discord in my life anon and have no interest. just passing through desu