Holy this kino was boring. Why did PTA pick such a pleb pinecone book. Mason and dixon would have been the patrician choice
Yeah a 2-hour Hollywood version of Mason & Dixon would have been great eh
It feels a little weird that Pynchon approved this to be honest. I haven't seen it (or read IV) but the other Pynchon I've read is very word-based. I can't imagine him working well in movie form
I haven't read the novel but I do enjoy the film. It's like Chinatown on acid.
he was trying to get in on that big lewbowski money
>>9319119
>look at me I'm so patrician.
Both the movie and the book were great
>>9319819
Movie was perfect. You're a disease.
>>9319119
It was a fun little movie. PTA is for sure a pleb though. I recall an interview where he admitted that he's never managed to finish Gravity's Rainbow.
>>9320090
he's a kino god
pynchon liked him a hell of a lot more than he'd like you
grow up
yeah marc maron asked him if he'd read gravitys rainbow and you can tell pta was like "dammit whyd you ask me that, im not gonna lie, but i dont relish outing myself as a pleb either" as he said he hadnt.
in the same interview he recalled how he had dfw as a prof at emerson. can there be any doubt that when infinite jest came out he bought it and at least tried to read it? your fav prof from back in the day put out a huge novel that everyones clamoring about... he probably bought it on day 1. furthermore i also like to think that he had infinite jest in mind when he did magnolia. like, here's my american epic, here's my infinite jest, with its multiple characters and intersecting storylines, the 3 hour movie is the 1000 page novel, and so on. and i like to think he was trying to ape infinite jest's blue sky poster when he did the poster in pic related (which, if i recall the making of magnolia correctly, he actually did or had a hand in).
i like to think all this shit because it makes that much more fucked up that dfw wrote to don delillo in the late 90s that hed just seen two movies, the matrix and magnolia, and that the matrix was great but magnolia was garbage, calling it "100% gradschoolish in a bad way"
>>9320545
If you unironically use the word kino in a 4chan post you're in no position to be telling anyone they need to grow up. Besides, I don't think he's a bad director or anything, just a pleb when it comes to literature.
>>9320576
>dfw wrote to don delillo in the late 90s that hed just seen two movies, the matrix and magnolia, and that the matrix was great but magnolia was garbage, calling it "100% gradschoolish in a bad way"
Wow, shit taste much
>>9320640
can't hope for anything but shit taste from the sinceritymeister
>>9320576
>tfw half way through IJ
>i watch some movie called magnolia last week
>holy shit the similarities
it's one of my favorite movies and he very obviously was going for an "infinite jest" movie adaptation.
if anyone is going to adapt infinite jest it's got to be p.t. anderson.
>>9320580
Even Pynchon uses that word, kys
>>9320741
No u, fampire.
>>9320807
Yes I do
t. Pynchon
>>9319908
such*
I'm ten minutes into Magnolia. How could DFW say that about his film? It's a fucking unofficial adaptation of IJ.
i believe he said he wanted to adapt something by pynchon, originally Against the Day, then decided on inherent vice because it had just come out.
>>9319119
the book is entertaining and so is the movie
>>9319119
Coen brothers would've done a much better job
>>9322428
You're fucking crazy. It couldn't have been better. Those guys already made inherent vice anyway
is this pynchon?
>>9319119
What kind of retard do you have to be to think an 800 page book can be adapted into a 2-hour film?
Inherent Vice wasn't a very good adaptation, but l doubt anyone could have made it any better. PTA is GOAT and the film is perfectly fine if you consider its own merits instead of comparing it to the book.
>>9319819
IV isn't your typical Pynchon book. It's probably the only book of his that could have been adapted.
>>9322491
>Still thinking there was a Pynchon cameo
>>9322491
no but here he is on the right
>>9319119
>pinecone book
?
>>9322579
Oh my god the madman actually did it
inherent vice movie grew on me after a while, have seen it like 10x by now and love it
>>9322741
Yeah, it's an acquired taste of sorts. The OST is good and made me discover CAN, and thats a huge plus to the movie. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yNvJiIvitBQ
>>9322491
I've posted him so many times but no on gives me the time of day. He's in the dentist office. White hair. Back to us.
>>9320576
doesnt surprise me that he hadnt read GR, i'm not sure he fully understands IV, or it's just a result of the hollywood system, but his adaptation leaves out 75% of the novel
>>9322667
I don't know if it's right, though. Some guy who wrote about meeting Pynchon said he had an Einstein-like mop of curly grey hair.
>>9322754
>not listening to music before watching films
>not watching films before reading books
>not reading books before coming on /lit/
>>9322754
>only links a 9 minute video of an 18 minute song
The best part of the movie was the scene at the start with the doc and Joanna Newsom narrating and Vitamin C was playing in the background
>>9323499
>>9323505
>adam sambergowitzstein is plowing her ass every single day
FUGGG
I doubt PTA can make another film that could top The Master.
But it did introduce me to top tier music.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OQt4e3Odc2c
>>9324353
TWBB >>> Master
Not saying it isn't good
How many times does the phrase Inherent Vice occur in the Recognitions? 1-3, 3-5, or 5-10?
>>9325180
I'm going to fucking kill you
>>9319119
are there other similar kinos to that kino?
>>9325264
Cool. You're a bit late, though.
>>9325351
It is a legal term, but not in the sense that habeas corpus is a legal term. More like Force majeure.
>>9325351
Yeah I had already seen BL, is BL based on inherent vice?
>>9325490
For the same reason I wonder if Dick got the title for A scanner darkly from a book on the early church by Henry Chadwick in which he writes of Origen's view of relative vs. absolute truth: "We see through a glass, darkly".
It could be coincidence, or it could be an esoteric insight into a private moment of inspiration of a writer held in high esteem by a community of readers.
>God forbid I should discußs the relationships between literary works on a board ostensibly devoted to literature.
>>9325549
Ok, your silly fun time aside, you always present it like he stole it, when it's not an altogether uncommon term.
A scanner darkly is a biblical reference.
You're not discussing anything, you're just being a retard.
>>9325423
Inherent Vice is based on The Big Lebowski
>>9325560
"A true artist never borrows anything; he steals it outright" - Oscar Wilde
>>9325581
Why is Pynchon such a hack