Reading the tunnel right now, the first 100 pages has been unalloyed

It doesn't get good until 200 pages in pleb.

>>9317564
If that's true then my scrotum might hemorrhage, I nut at least once per page. I'm gonna get back to reading it now.

>>9317552
I am /pol/ and apparently this book discusses Hitler. Is it pro national socialist? Does he question the holocaust at all? If it's just going to be the uneducated mainstream version of history then I'm not interested. I'd really like to know before wasting time reading it. Thanks.

>>9317587
Holy fuck not Op, just google it you fucking scumbag. You're literally a girl "I'm POL SO GIVE ME ATTENTION WAH." Learn your fucking board and stay there, otherwise don't act like we have to cater to your needs.

>>9317603
I don't want to spoil the book too much, I just want to know which side he's on. Fuck you.

>>9317603
Also, /lit/ was my main board long before I started browsing /pol/. Some reviews suggest the protagonist is a "disgusting person", so I guess he might be pretty red pilled. Most seem to spoil far too much of the plot though, so I haven't read much of them.

>>9317625
shut up and read it to see for youself you mong

>>9317631
Fine. But if he doesn't become red pilled, I will tear this book apart every time I see a thread on it.

File: 1489941693292.jpg (152KB, 515x823px) Image search: [Google]

152KB, 515x823px

>>9317652
Jesus Christ this was the best mildly autistic string of messages I've ever seen, thanks Anon.

>>9317991
This picture is aesthetic af. Thanks for sharing.

>>9317998
I feel your pain of growing bored with all this anti Nazi shit. It's truly stupefying how much newly discovered evidence Netflix finds against the Third Reich every week. I take it like a pill though.

>>9317606
>i only read stuff that confirms my prejudices
who else /manbabby/ here?

>>9318760
It's not prejudice. The WW2 we have been taught in school and had drilled into us is just plain wrong. Hitler wasn't the "most evil man to ever exist". Not even close.

>>9320353
so who is, in your opinion, the most evil man ever to live?

>>9320501
Ludwig van Beethoven, who ended the highest form of art.

>>9317587
>I'm from /pol/
>is this gonna help reaffirm my ideology?
what the fuck kind of faggot reasoning is that? The book is God-tier American lit, it brings so much more to the table than political ball-fondling. Don't drag art down to your level, approach it with the respect to its complexity that it demands from you.
If you have to ask, you probably can't hang with Gass's lesser works, let alone his magnum opus

>>9320501
I don't believe people go out of there way to be "evil" or anything like that. The road to hell is paved with good intentions. However, if you really pushed me, I'd have to say Mao, Stalin or Pol Pot. Hitler doesn't even come close to any of these in maliciousness or magnitude.

>>9320533
It's important to me to know if he is brainwashed by mainstream culture or an enlightened thinker. That will have a huge impact on the quality of his ideas and writing.

>>9321725
>brainwashed by mainstream culture or an enlightened thinker
just go back.

>>9321756
Your mind has been cucked so hard by ((( them ))) that you don't even know it. You realise some of the smartest men to ever live were branded "antisemitic", right? It's what happens when you ask too many of the right questions. You closed minded fool.

File: 1475521738790.jpg (165KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

165KB, 640x480px

>>9321769
k

>>9321804
You have a choice. Continue to be satisfied with your inferior knowledge or delve into the truth you hate and be free of your delusional "superiority".

now this is an ultra-basic false flag

>>9321820
>Your mind has been cucked so hard by ((( them ))) that you don't even know it
>You realise some of the smartest men to ever live were branded "antisemitic", right?
>It's what happens when you ask too many of the right questions. You closed minded fool.
>Continue to be satisfied with your inferior knowledge or delve into the truth you hate
>be free of your delusional "superiority".
kindly point out where I implied anything remotely close to any of this

it's the guy replying to himself, nobody would be tricked by that