>Aha, so you say statement X is true
>But if statement X is true, then something scary and disturbing will happen
>Ergo, statement X is false
>Checkmate atheists
Is this accurate summation of this man's philosophy?
>>9314696
Apologetics and philosophy aren't the same thing. That is pretty much what he was saying though.
>>9314696
Shut the fuck up you dumb fedora.
cs lewis is not a philosopher
>>9314696
That's just typical normie arguing. A good runner up is
>Aha, so you say statement X is true
>But you do not live according to X
>Ergo, statement X is false
>Checkmate anyone who isn't a moral nihilist
>>9314696
this is a perfectly reasonable way to argue. what exactly is wrong with it?
>>9315097
Saying something can't be real because it scares you isn't a sound argument.
>>9315097
>Spiders are real, eh? Well guess what? Spiders are scary therefore they mustn't exist! HAHA! Better luck next time, gaytheists.