>People who use the term 'spook' unironically Anyone

>>9289270
You sound spooked there, ragamuffin.

>>9289270
it's all ironic lad, you're just buttfrustrated

File: Heh.jpg (63KB, 1002x750px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 1002x750px

>>9289270
Stop projecting, pathetic faggot

>>9289270
also I can have no respect for the law and still wish for it to be a concept believed by others if it benefits me.

>the term 'spook'

Are you talking about niggers?

Yes, because without law and order everyone would just rip each other in twain. Go back to watching The Purge, you retard.

The fact that you think people must act a certain way is pretty spooky.

>>9289270
>In a world where everyone acted selfishly,

You mean the only kind of world inhabitable by humans? You have fallen into the old trap of using "selfish" to mean "hedonistic," which you wouldn't do if you'd actually read Stirner. Maybe you should try to understand your "enemy" before assaulting him

>>9289270
Said the fuckwad who has been raised by his family and didn't have to struggle until he was at least 14.

Fuck off maggot.

>>9290053
>unironic anarchist
Top kek, kill yourself.

>>9290053
>people don't follow incentives
>jealousy, anger, etc. aren't real
>thinking game theory is a spook when it's demonstrably correct
I bet you don't believe in maths either.

File: typicalliberal.png (487KB, 449x685px) Image search: [Google]

487KB, 449x685px

>>9290148
>unironic statist
Wow, neat, I thought these only existed IRL

>>9289270
Man that cover is shit.

>>9290152
>implying the principled liberal position isn't to arm the entire populace
the american left is far from liberal desu

>>9290137
>Struggle
That's a spook.

>>9290053
Without the rule of law and morality I know for a fact there would be paramilitary fascist groups dedicated to the eradication of undesirables. Leftists would be the first on their list.

>>9290170
This, political newbie retards have no idea what left/liberal/progressive/conservative/right actually means

>>9290592
Maybe because those terms are extremely vague and terribly defined in the first place, with meaning shifting among different cultures? The left/right dichotomy has its original in the French revolution for fucks sake, and its meaning has shifted wildly over the centuries.

Progressive/conservative dichotomy is also awfully defined. In America it's pretty easy to point to a fundamentalist Christian and say he's a conservative, and that someone who wants universal healthcare and a ban on guns is a liberal. But what about an American fascist? Is he a progressive or a conservative? The dichotomy quickly loses its meaning. The term 'liberal' has lost all meaning as well because everyone is a liberal but no one describes themselves as one, yet those that do call themselves liberals could use a more descriptive term.
Maybe it's time to realize that you can't lump complex political thought systems into two different categories and call it a day.

>>9289270
Exactly.

>>9289270
Spooks are spooks

>>9290170
The image is a joke. I know what classical liberalism is. You missed the point.

>>9290592
A statist is a statist. I have learned from reading "political philosophy" that label-slinging is a futile exercise.