I want to read this, never have. Is it campy at all? What I mean by this, is it the text equivalent of the typical "Frankenstein" green Halloween mask or is it actually mature/dark in any way? I just have this ingrained assumption about it. I'd like to be proved wrong.
Thanks.
I think you'll be pleasantly surprised, just give it a go
t. written his bachelor thesis on Frankenstein
>>9268891
I've just been reading some amazon reviews. One of them says
"Forget square-heads and green make-up, forget that dreadful modern remake with Kenneth Branagh and Robert DeNiro sit down and read one of the most remarkable science fiction stories ever written. "
So this makes me feel like giving it a go as I when I hear Frankenstein I often think of the above scenario. But it sounds like it could be quite good from these reviews.
My main question is if it's for adults, really.
"his is far from the popularised version of a tall, square headed freak with bolts in his neck; in fact it's almost like someone has been playing Chinese whispers with this story. The gruesome experimentation of the doctor whist playing a big role in creating a context is actually quite a small part of the plot. Shelley explores man's race towards their dreams and the inevitable horror and disappointment when they are achieved. The results are an exploration into each character and in depth analysis of things which turn them into the monsters they become."
I think I'll buy it then.
>>9268945
Yes. Read it, it's worth it.
monumental for queer literature, read it!
>>9268969
What do you mean?
You should read it. It's an achievement.
:)
>>9268969
it has nothing to do with queer literature
stop trying to queer the canon
there's plenty of actually queer literature to champion
>>9268871
The writing is atrocious. Just watch Young Frankenstein and call it a day.
>>9268871
>campy
Not at all.
>>9268871
It's a fucking fantastic book
>>9269000
Please, compared to Dickens it's a monumental feat