Sup, you beautiful /lit/erates? I'm conflicted as to what

>>9267421
I love the few OWC I have they are way nicer then penguin classics.

I usually go for the Oxford editions of classic texts if I don't want to compare too much. Their texts and footnotes are usually pretty good.

File: 51-eZ5qMgfL._SX329_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg (47KB, 331x499px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 331x499px

>>9267421

cambridge editions are pretty standard for academic or scholarly uses.

File: 418UrfzSriL._SY344_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg (18KB, 226x346px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 226x346px

>>9267421
if you're looking for sophists, Penguin Classics has an entirely separate book dedicated to them.

File: 31fEaF88CvL._BO1,204,203,200_.jpg (13KB, 182x272px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 182x272px

This is the only correct answer, not positivist and secular interpretations, just text.

>>9267746
Ya, but it's expensive as fuck.

>>9267866
Just go to libgen.

>>9267593
>>9267661
>>9267672
>>9267719
>>9267746
Thanks guys

>>9267870
Found it thanks man.

>>9267421
I have and read the Oxford one. I don't really know what the authors are working with, they give interpretation of the Philosopher's works and some fragments.

I'd say check out >>9267746
but I think at least I can vouch for Oxford as a good quick primer before getting into Plato.

>>9267421
Oxford, it's the better book. Penguin's translation isn't as good.

File: barnes.jpg (23KB, 213x235px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 213x235px

Is Diels-Kranz definitely too old ?

>>9267892
would appreciate your help in finding it anon, if you don't mind

>>9268444
no, it still includes basically everything

I know it doesn't matter, but damn the Penguin covers are so nice.

>>9267421
I got the first one and it was alright. I think I'll have to go back and read it again though.