>Questions that cannot be answered are not worth asking
What do think, anon?
>>9233716
Retarded in most cases, as the means of answering those kinds of questions usually come about by the very fact that they're consistently asked.
>>9233716
How can you distinguish between answerable and unanswerable questions?
>>9233725
That's another of those stupid unanswerable ones!
>>9233725
you can answer the answerable ones and you can't answer the unanswerable ones, duh
>>9233716
Depends on what you mean by unanswerable.
There are plenty of reasonable people who believe it is impossible to know for certain whether a deity exists or not, doesn't stop people from asking the question. Others consider the same question answerable.
Some 'unanswerable' questions have become answerable through time with science, as a lot of theoretical physic hypothesis have been proven.
>>9233716
This question is not answerable.
>>9233716
A question can always be answered. Whether the answer is a good answer asks if there might be an even better answer.
All questions can be answered, and all answers can be questioned.
*tips fedora*
*exeunt*
>>9233903
Now that's some serious bullshit you got right there.
And who the fuck tips in a literary conversation. You know that half the shit /lit/ is centered around is fedora-tier, right?
The problem is that you can't know if a question cannot be answered without first asking it.
>>9233903
what the hell does *exeunt* mean?
Answers that cannot be given are not worthy answers.
Questions that can be answered are boring
>>9234011
Questions are boring, literally.
Answers are interesting, literally.
Is there a God?
>Every question has an answer. Not all answers can be shared.
What do you think of this anon?