What are some books, facts, things, etc., that ever well-read

File: top2016.jpg (3MB, 1820x4352px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1820x4352px

The only list you'll ever need.

>>9230453
Jerusalem's that good?

>>9230428
James Joyce was a fart fetishist.

>>9230501
nobody had even read it yet when it made the list.

>>9230555
LOL! Classic /lit/!

>>9230453
>tfw already read the best books
What is the point of reading now?

File: image.jpg (2MB, 2016x2880px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2016x2880px

>>9230428
A well-read man would take the true redpill.

>>9230453
What a shit tier list.

>>9230453
>>9230585
i don't know which one is shittier

>>9230585
Needs more fiction

File: 1486115847412.jpg (61KB, 551x600px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 551x600px

>>9230585
>Anarchism
> Stirner nowhere to be found
>INTO THE TRASH IT GOES

>>9230697
Who are you quoting?

>>9230697
It says social anarchism
It's a fucking spook

File: stirner4.png (58KB, 636x674px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 636x674px

>>9230697
>stirner
>anarchist

Get a load of this haunted-ass motherfucker

>>9230728
Nigger are you stupid
You obviously haven't read Stirner

>>9230733
I've read and understood him, as opposed to merely reading him as you have done, fuckboy.

"Therefore we two, the State and I, are enemies. I, the egoist, have not at heart the welfare of this “human society,” I sacrifice nothing to it, I only utilize it; but to be able to utilize it completely I transform it rather into my property and my creature; i. e., I annihilate it, and form in its place the Union of Egoists."

He was not an "anarchist." He considered the anarchism of e.g. Marx and Bakunin (actual anarchism, i.e. Communism, none of this "anarcho-capitalist" garbage that is so popular today) to be as dangerous and as futile as revolutionary nationalism or republicanism. You don't destroy the State in the same way that you don't destroy God: both are nothing, so they "exist" only to be "annihilated," i.e. made back into nothing. So he would use the State to his ends, and in doing so, further its final dissolution. But it was not his "mission" to overthrow the State, and this mission is the foundation of anarchism.

>>9230767
>What's individualist anarchism?

>>9230767
What a meaningless distinction. Sure he was opposed to classical anarchism. However to say his 'union of egoists' and dissolution of the state are not anarchist because they are egoistic is just stupid.
See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Individualist_anarchism#Max_Stirner

>>9230789
Oh, but here's a lovely little Wikipedia article that will pass itself off as gospel. But it contradicts itself. In the article, it says, "Stirner does not recommend that the individual try to eliminate the state but simply that they disregard the state when it conflicts with one's autonomous choices and go along with it when doing so is conducive to one's interests."

How is this "anarchism," a belief that the state ought to be abolished? Oh, right, because it's on Wikipedia, it must be so

>>9230836
Not our fault you don't understand Stirner or anarchism.

>>9230846
Nor is it my fault you're so stupid that your opinions are copy-pasted from Wikipedia

>>9230453
Interesting how Moby Dick has the #2 spot, yet it's hardly ever spoken about, especially relative to the other top books

>>9231096
Because that one isn't a meme

>>9231096
Back when the chart was made Moby Dick was discussed a lot

>>9231301
What's so good about Moby Dick is there some underlying wisdom behind the story ?Genuinely curious

>>9230428
Why does she have about eight eyebrows, terrifying image OP.