>Numbers didn’t just describe reality; numbers were reality, discrete step functions smoothing up across the Planck length into an illusion of substance. [People] still quibbled over details, doubtless long since resolved by precocious children who never bothered to write home: Was the universe a hologram or a simulation? Was its boundary a program or merely an interface—and if the latter, what sat on the other side, watching it run? (A few latter-day religions had predictably answered that question with the names of their favorite deities, although Brüks had never been entirely clear on what an omniscient being would need a computer for. Computation, after all, implied a problem not yet solved, insights not yet achieved. There was really only one sort of program for which foreknowledge of the outcome didn’t diminish the point of the exercise, and Brüks had never been able to find any religious orders that described God as a porn addict.)
Number is antithetic to word as quantity is antithetic to quality.
>>9221745
Ah, good old Watts.Seriously can we do like a kickstarter for this dude or something? He wants to write and I think a lot of people want to read him, but he's expressed a few times that he's having trouble with funding and publication processes generally. Feel like the online lit community should be able to help him in some way.