Look at this shit. Reddit was completely unable to answer my

[–]penispenis9 2 Punkte vor 16 Stunden

The arbitrary creation of a concept by a person sitting in a room thinking about something is not analogous to the creation of the concept of morality. Morality didn't come from nowhere, it has a real history. Bad analogy. All creation is not equal

OP btfo by a redditor. SAD!

It's worth investigating because we have strong intuitions about what concept1 says we should do in certain situations, so it's useful to try to formalize those intuitions together into some coherent generalization so that we know what the concept1 recommendation is for more ambiguous situations, where we intuitively want to follow concept1 but don't as easily intuit the right course of action. It's precisely because we want to develop coherent theories of action that follow certain of our concept1 intuitions that generalizations are interesting.

>ask* subreddits
Jesus Anon those are almost as bad as the bad* subreddits, why would you even bother?

>>9212652

>a half assed attempt to appeal to the perceived importance that society places upon the concept "morality"
>regards to acknowledge the infinite possible criteria (and criteria for choosing criteria, ad infinitum) that could be used for judging "creations"

Typical philosophy phan. He appeals to popular thinking instead of acknowledging the infinite possible viewpoints. He sticks his head in the sand if you claim there are infinitely many possible views and that Philosophy as practised by academia has not exhausted all possibilities.

>>9212660

Refuses, not regards

>>9212652
>OP btfo by a redditor. SAD!
And he discredited most philosophers. Who knew leddit contained such incredible power?