I've seen Stirner described as the logical conclusion of Hegel. What is meant by this?
>>9191019
>>9191019
>What is meant by this?
>>9191019
Pseud being a pseud
if I understand correctly, Stirner uses 'the ego' as the Absolute, so nothing can be brought in dialectical opposition to it because it is the conclusion of the dialectical process. that's why he disregards everything that tries to water down the ego as 'spooks' or 'fixed ideas'