Can we ban philosophy threads to /his/ already? I'm having

>Wanting stricter moderation.
>Banning things.

Fuck off back to Redit.

>>9186819
I agree

>>9186819
>not using the catalog
you deserve all the suffering you get and more

Bump because this is true

>>9186826
this LOLOLOLOLOL epikkkkkkk 4chan is muh secret club with le no rules LMAO WE IS LEJUN!!!

>>9186834
This. How dim are you

>>9186834
>>9187928
I do use the catalogue, mentioning page three is only pointing out how philosophy threads, which are really mostly just thinly disguised politics shitposting, are distracting the board from actual literature.

>>9187926
>>9186819
>>9187947
no really, go back to fucking reddit.

>>9187950
>every board should be /b/

>>9187957
>"Lets ban Philosophical Literature from /lit/, it is getting in the way of my genre fiction and highschool level prose and poetry threads"

I'll be sure to post some philosophy threads just 4 u mate.

>>9188010
The vast majority of these threads aren't even discussing philosophic texts. You can argue any topic is literature if someone wrote about it in a book at some point

>>9187950
LOL WAY TO EPIC BTFO THEM REDDITORS M8 WE ARE ANONYMOUS SO KEWL LOL NIGGERS TONGUE MY ANUS HITLER DID NOTHING WRONG BIG GUY FOR YOU!!!!

LOL!!!!

>>9188027
And your solution is banning philosophy.
>>>redit

>>9188059
Yeah sure, we have a whole board for humanities discussion now. This board has never been for any and all books

>>9186819
imagine being called "harold"

what a fucking joke

>>9186819
This

Alternatively force it to become one general at a time max

Philosophy is for neckbeards who need others to do the thinking for them so they can then pretend to be smart and enlightened for aping the conclusions and experiences of other people. Actual "philosophers" themselves are nothing but egotists who should have been shot instead of paying them for their fucking opinions

File: 1455677634403.jpg (275KB, 1051x951px) Image search: [Google]

275KB, 1051x951px

>>9188058
Let's ban misogyny and racism too?

>>9186819
Even understading your point, I should say that its intentionality might be a symptom of a greater ideology, that of ultra-specialism. Endlessly cutting, sperating, creating taxonomies, to divide, always to divide, be it knowledge, arts or any expression. Sometimes its interstices, philsophically inclined literature, or the opposite, exactly when this difference cannot differentiate itself needing ideology for that; a Michel Serres, Emil Cioran, etc.

We all end up losing. This is not but a modern symptom of a greater especialistic ideology.

>>9188305
savage

>>9188276
Yeah I guess you wouldn't mind getting to fucked in the ass by some guy like 1.5 times larger than you and be completely powetless.
I can't tell if the person who made that image is so committed to being edgy the they just gave up on reason or never had it in the first place.

>>9188276
Let's ban whiny SJWs first

>>9188345
Yeah both right and left wing SJWs