This guy doesn't even criticise who he's talking about. Doesn't reference any texts in debate, doesn't quote any diaries, passages or speeches.
All he does is describe their philosophy, or rather, his interpretations and NOTHING ELSE! It's as though he actually thinks mere description is argumentation.
What the actual fuck? IS THIS REALLY the modern Zeitgeist?
Foucault isn't fond of citations either
he's using a foucaultian method, brainlet
Well maybe you stop posting this faggot then. He's not a writer, he's a boring academic with a youtube channel.
>>9184758
>He's not a writer
...
:)
>he thinks an infinite recursion of quoting other philosophers back to the greeks is "proof" or "an argument"
also stop calling everything that is mildly popular "Zeitgeist." Fucking pseuds these days.
>>9184758
he has a book published and another coming you god damn idiot. Can't you fucks do 2 seconds of research before posting.
>>9184763
How can you attack someone in dozens of 1 hour long lectures and debates without actually referencing what they're talking about?
>Hur dur x guy is stupid because he made this claim about logic
>I wont explain his thought or my critique, ill just strawman
>>9184754
actually it's nietzschean
>>9184769
the fact he didn't already have 10 major treatises published before age 25 proves he's not a true intellectual