Williams describes Archer Sloane as being "betrayed"

>democratic modifications

just poke the microprocessor already

>>9173639
Well war is fun isn't it, Hemingway said that. Its addictive the intensity, a film like hurt locker with the guy back from war mincing through the supermarket, just totally out of his element, dunno I haven't read Stoner

I don't know, but if you almost die for what you believe in, and then some suits up and go "Oh, yeah. The war's over, everybody go home," I can understand being a little upset.

I mean, what were you even fighting for, if it was that easy to stop?

>>9173648
Sloane wasn't in WW1 though. I don't see how he would have such a close connection to it. Maybe it's too small of a point to try and make sense of but it just got me thinking.