How does /lit/ feel about this book? It's the first book

Also, do you recommend any other Hugo books?

>>9162606
It's good, but Les Mis is better, albeit even more long-winded, but don't be intimitaded by the length. Hunchback is great for it's era but Les Mis in general is considered the book to have launched Hugo to be one of the forefront runners of the Romantic literary movement in France

>>9162613
thanks anon

Esmeralda is a fucking stupid dumb whore

>>9162613
>referring to 'Les Miserables' as 'Les Mis'

Your opinion is utterly worthless.

>>9162784
he's not wasting his time on writing long sentences of a snob like you do.

>>9162870
As difficult as it is to understand your illiterate comment, it *seems* as though you're saying that getting the title of a book right is snobbish and a waste of time. If so, yours is the sort of deep-level stupidity that doesn't require refutation.

>>9162606
I recommend not ever reading The Man Who Laughs

>>9162771
She was a 15th century homeless French girl, calm down.

>>9162990
Why?