Are there any books on relativity somewhat similar to Brian Greene's

>>9158100
Sure, but it won't be accurate. Pop science is for actual brainlets who want all the neat ideas that are really just reified abstractions for what is really going on. You would be better off reading some philosophy of physics

>>9158100
Sure, Im not one for pleb tier science reads but if you must, Michio Kaku is your bro. Pick up "Beyond Einstein," "Physics of the Impossible," and "Hyperspace." All three are good entry-level "pop science" treatments of big questions in theoretical physics today.

If you want a non-pop science introduction, read Manjit Kumar's "Quantum." That's a phenomenal primer from the Blackbody radiation problem all the way through modern physics, and you don't have to be a mathematician to understand the nuances of it.

File: 51mBauueQ9L._SX331_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg (32KB, 333x499px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 333x499px

>>9158100
Any feedback on The Problem With Gravitational Time Dilation & Human Perception?