I was told some time ago when I made a thread about this book that it was worth it.
Well, I tried to read it and I now want to burn it.
It is the most pretentious piece of writing I have ever read. Literally. It is worse than my diary desu.
A stretched-out narrative filled with cliches and empty metaphors that tries to hard to be smart and cultured by referencing classical artists in a way that would be considered horrible writing in elementary school.
Do no bother with this piece of crap.
>>9156588
It's just middle brow lit. It's quite cosy, gothic and pleasant to read but it never set out to change your world view.
The sequels a fucking travesty though.
>>9156588
That's what I suspected when I saw it recommended in a thread a few days ago. I didn't judge it only by its cover (although that works too), but just look at that title: doesn't it scream pompous balderdash? As ridiculous as the phrase "pompous balderdash" sounds, I'd much rather read a book named exactly that than this tawdry piffle (sorry, I'm reading Nabokov's collected criticism and he keeps talking like that).
>>9156762
Sometimes things get lost in translation. In context of the lingo used by the Spanish it probably doesn't sound as ham fisted.
I enjoyed it as a 16 year old, though that doesn't mean to say I'd judge someone for enjoying it at a more mature age. Some stories capture us, others don't. After all, there is a reason it is such a wildly popular book.