What does /lit/ think about Dr. Sadler's videos? As someone

>>9156351
>/pol/ BTFO

>>9156351
Haven't watched any in a while but, yeah, he's incredibly based.

And there's nothing worse than a /pol/tard who knee-jerks only and cannot engage with ideas in a neutral sense. This is a sign of low intelligence, according to Aristotle.

>>9156351
what a patrician. i remember him speaking to his class and asking them questions, which they were unable to answer in a general manner, and he essentially blamed it on their prior education. shit was cash yo. he still went on to teach em though.

>>9156404
>a /pol/tard who knee-jerks only and cannot engage with ideas in a neutral sense.
kinda redundant

>>9156351
no discernable talent. srsly, there's plenty of other good philosophy stuff on YouTube.

>>9156570
>>9156404
>>9156361
>>9156351

Why has this board become so obsessed with /pol/? Can someone explain what's so great about Sadler instead of going on these essentially irrelevant tangents?

>>9156610
He's got a lot of great youtube lectures about philosophy. If you want to understand Aristotle, Hegel, Heidegger, watch his lectures.

>>9156610
>Why has this board become so obsessed with /pol/?
That's basically every board now. I'm pretty sure /pol/ has superceded /v/ at this point being the most popular board, and naturally results in tons of spill over of newfags thinking the whole site is variations on /pol/, like it used to be with /b/.

he speaks too slowly, too much obvious banality and whenever he gets into literature (eg Kafka) its painfully hopeless. Other than that he's aright.

lol dr sadler from jurassic park! nice.....

i wish he was my sensei