Recently started reading books. But I loose interest very fast. It's necessary to finish the book?
>>9154849
You can read short stories if novels are too long for you.
It's not if you actually don't enjoy reading it, but if it's like that with every book over 100 pages then I think you need to make an effort. In general, though, it is not necessary to read stuff you don't like, just remember to challenge yourself from time to time.
If you recently started reading, I'm going to go out on a limb here and say that you're probably either reading A) Crap, or B) Things which just do not interest you.
I don't think you'd have trouble finishing something you enjoyed a lot, unless it was extremely long, like Wealth of Nations.
Which genres interest you the most, so we can suggest some things for you.
you're fucking a woman. is it necessary to keep going until you nut?
>>9155422
i never fucked a women so i don't get the analogy
>>9154849
how the hell reads books at 90% then let's it go?
>>9155457
When you're about to cum but she says Marcel Proust only writes for prose.
>>9155447
the analogy is broken because the guy you replied to hasn't fucked a women wither.
>>9154849
this is one of the central ironies of /lit/, condemning you if you don't finish a work, and but yet, the other day i see a thread talking about an unfinished work, and people ridiculing reading for plot. well which is it? if i leave a book unfinished, i'm taking what i wish, when you complain, you're just echoing the plotheads, and you are the same people who will assault anyone they can with
>lol he reads for plot
>>9156835
REEEEEEEEEE
Proust even talks about writers who write only for prose!
>BERGOTTE WHY
>>9154849
> is it necessary to finish the book