Who else here remembers /thatguy/ who made a bunch of sockpuppet

>>9141380
>and then paraded it around on here as an example of /pol/ being retarded?

Are you disputing this?

I hope you're not going to reproduce.

>>9141380
http://archive.4plebs.org/pol/search/text/hegelian%20dialectic/page/17/

>years and years worth of this 'Hegelian dialectic' conspiracy shit
>flags from every conceivable nation

Dedication from that leftist cuck!

>>9141386
/pol/ is dumb (mostly because of the recent elections and reddit crossposters), but it is a lot more ideologically diverse than people make it out to be.

I'm just highlighting an example of this man's desperation. He hopes to create a simulacrum of /pol/ that turns most people off, and his not-so-subtle inclusion of Hegel is an attempt to present people a socialist alternative, if you will.

Go ahead and read Hegel, by all means! It's not even as if his thought is necessarily left-wing! But if you want people to read him just shill him in the normal way instead of annoying all of the regular users here by posting transparent sockpuppet 'redpills' on every thread. I mean even /pol/ tries to convince people with infographics. This guy just screams about the 'inherent superiority' of men and whites in every thread.

@ /thatguy/:
Nobody is buying it. Also your political ideology is stupid man. Everyone told you the manifesto was cringe (which is probably why you only posted it once).

>>9141409
Yeah, doubtless there are others who have posted about this shit, but it's mostly one salty American who has latched onto it.

He posts multiple times in almost every thread on this board, and he's often the first poster. Don't discount his dedication.

>>9141427
/pol/ retards on /lit/ are really just socialists trying to subvert the board.

Proof is how /pol/ is ostensibly filled with retards who use the term Hegelian dialectic wrongly. In reality, it is simply another of these socialists.

m8, /pol/ are retards, this Hegelian conspiracy theory has existed for a long time, and the triggered one on here is a retard too.
Now stop taking this place so seriously. /pol/ are incredibly stupid and people who get triggered by them are incredibly stupid.

>>9141380
Probably the same guy that gets triggered by every Pepe image.

>>9141483
Pepe threads are legitimately shit 90% of the time, though.

It's the same dude who gets triggered when there's a frog as OP picture, when the word redpill is used, and even when someone posts a goodreads review of some stupid girl because it's misogynistic, and when someone posts about Houellebecq. He's been doing this for months but he's getting sloppy.

I wish you faggots would stop using the word triggered

>>9141505
reddit are destroying this board. We have always been borderline /pol/, this is nothing new.

>>9141505
It just surprises me how many people seriously reply to him. You'd think they would be able to see through the bait.

File: ffffffffffffffffffff.jpg (10KB, 250x241px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 250x241px

>>9141409

>>9141517
This is literally me.

I'm just here for (You)s. I post both the redpiller bait and the triggered leftist response. Stop thinking this is a crusade against the alt-right, it's solely for the collection of (You)s. I also start most of the threads about Harry Potter and 'has a woman ever written a masterpiece'.

I'm simply addicted to the attention. I collect upwards of 400 (You)s in a matter of hours, leaving my stench all over this place, in every thread that is even remotely politics-related. I will make it into a discussion on race, women, or 'muh bigoted /pol/ Nazis boogeyman'.
I am a collector. Don't question it or try to understand it. It's who I am and what I do

>>9141517
It's always gullible lefties.

>>9141514
>We have always been borderline /pol/, this is nothing new

t. been here for 18 months

>>9141380
>>9141409
So let me get this straight: your entire autistic rant in the OP come from the fact that you think that every right-winger who mentions Hegelian dialectics here is actually one left-wing dude pretending to be stupid to discredit /pol/?

Because some basic research would tell you you're wrong. This shit got huge in the right-wing conspiracy universe because they think it's a technique to brainwash people

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e_oWIY_xiWc&t=9s&spfreload=10

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qvj-Opo2tOo

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GfliF-yulmI

It shouldn't be a surprise to you that they will drop a philosopher's name without knowing what he said.

>>9141582
Nice try. You're the ONE guy, aren't you

>>9141589
I assumed that would be the reply.

I don't know if you're just dumb or literally autistic, but something is wrong with you. Take some time off until you stop thinking you've seen the patterns and unveiled the plot, it's not a healthy way to live.

>>9141606
And a side note: you'll bring yourself a lot of unnecessary stress if you always assume /pol/ being dumb is the result of some hidden left-wing machinery.

>>9141606
>>9141612
How long did it take you to create all those videos and pretend like you didnt do it all by yourself

File: Bezmenov.jpg (11KB, 288x216px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 288x216px

>it's a "communist agitator thinks they wont be the first up against the wall once their agitation is no longer wanted" chapter

>>9141582
Nobody from /pol/ is coming to /lit/ just to spam "redpills"

>>9141647
The most laughable part of your post was that you thought that a /lit/izen would go to /pol/ and create a Hegelian dialectic conspiracy theory only then to condemn it on /lit/ by pointing out how stupid /pol/ are. m8 pls

Why are Redditors so vehement about calling everyone else a Redditor? Do you think it makes you blend in more?