"Sartre's main purpose is to assert the individual's existence as prior to the individual's essence ("existence precedes essence")."
This is one of the premises in Hegel's /Logic/, how does Sartre get away with claiming it's some new insightful discovery?
"Essence" does not at all mean the same thing. You can argue that Sartre didn't invent much and rather pillaged former authors, but his main ideas are clearly anti-hegelian.
>>9135810
Wasn't Sartre a hack who couldn't make up his mind and flipflopped between philosophical ideologies?