On 4channels it's characteristic to accompany a post with an image of a sexually attractive female to gain attention.
What does that say about ops choice of image?
>>9135687
Are you a bigot?
>>9135687
Did I somehow violate that characteristic, motherfucker? Because I don't believe I did.
>>9135701
daaaaamn so it's on then huh. eat shit, guy.
I have a huge amount of contempt for Whitman because I believe he contributed to the ruination of poetry. Unmetered poetry is trash.
>>9135679
get lost pedo
>>9135696
Milo?
>>9135730
What's the matter? 2 deep 4 u? Heh, move along kiddo.
not an American. i think i'll go re-read the letters that Bram Stoker wrote to Walt Whitman, describing himself in glowing physical detail and asking Walt in the most subtle terms possible how they could get together for the purposes of mutual cock-sucking.
Just heard about this on NPR on my drive home. About to download it now.
>>9137848
haha... what
>>9135679
I just read parts of it. It's unspeakably bad. Is that trash really Whitman? It seems impossible.
>>9137848
Nah, Stoker only lusted for Henry Irving. His poor wife Florence ("I turned down Oscar Wilde for this? At least he was a witty homosexual!")
>>9135730
You're trash and you don't understand what makes poetry, poetry.
Take your head out of the slop bucket, pig.
>>9135679
>anti-lawyer revenge fantasy
ha
>>9135730
I agree. Maybe I don't hate him but he's kind of like Mahler or Schoenberg or Ives if you want an American counterpart. There's just no argument to be made that the deconstructionist wank of the 20th century can hold a candle to the elegant form and grace of the romantics.
Do you like Walt Whitman?
>>9135696
When it comes to pedophilia, yes - you lowlife.