Are there any good rebuttals to "you can't kno nuthin you can't know nuthin?"
Bertrand Russel's remark that Radical Skepticism is "logically impeccable" but ultimately impossible to know seems correct to me, but it doesn't completely satisfy me
>>9125414
tell them to take the redpill
>>9125414
Om.
>"you can't know nothin'"
>How do you know that?
>>9125428
By jove, I think you've fucking done it
>>9125414
this will show them
>>9125414
Essentially, inquire into the conditions of posibility for such a statement to be made.
You don't have to prove something to somebody who already believes it. In this case, that is the idea that things can be known.