Is there a proper chronological way to read her work? Would it

>>9124336
>Is there a proper [...] way to read her work?
By not reading it at all.

>>9124344
Thanks for the bump

>>9124336
Would suggest Stirner, Jünger, Rothbard and Hoppe. They are more stimulating and insightful.

>>9124360
Im very new to this sort of thing and think she's a good starting point. I just want to know if there's a proper order I should read her

>>9124336
You should first read Politics, Nichomaquean Ethics, Les Miserables, Thus Spoke Zarathustra, and Beyond Good and Evil. In that order.

Now you can put her work into context. Start with The Fountainhead, preferably the re-edition that has a prologue by Rand.

>>9124396
I only have the three mentioned :-(

Appreciate the help